Skip to content

improvement(client-runtime): type createBlobPayloadPending as true | undefined #24466

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025

Conversation

jason-ha
Copy link
Contributor

@jason-ha jason-ha commented Apr 25, 2025

matching IDocumentSchemaCurrent.runtime
and eliminating telemetry noise

Follow-up for #24320 before released for use. Document schema is unchanged; only change is runtime option requirements.

…undefined

matching IDocumentSchemaCurrent.runtime
and eliminating telemetry noise
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 25, 2025 20:39
@jason-ha jason-ha requested a review from a team as a code owner April 25, 2025 20:39
@jason-ha jason-ha requested review from ChumpChief and removed request for Copilot April 25, 2025 20:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added area: runtime Runtime related issues area: tests Tests to add, test infrastructure improvements, etc public api change Changes to a public API base: main PRs targeted against main branch labels Apr 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ChumpChief ChumpChief left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question but otherwise makes sense I think! Thank you for helping me out here :-D

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import {
type IDocumentSchemaFeatures,
} from "../summary/index.js";

function boolToProp(b: boolean) {
function boolToProp(b: boolean | undefined) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see you removed the use of boolToProp below but also modified its params here - are both intended or should it just be one or the other?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No call is the most correct, but it doesn't matter for test code. I changed this because it can handle undefined and if used when not needed -- okay.
I did not change the production version of boolToProp as in production the call would be a waste.

Copy link
Contributor

🔗 No broken links found! ✅

Your attention to detail is admirable.

linkcheck output


> fluid-framework-docs-site@0.0.0 ci:check-links /home/runner/work/FluidFramework/FluidFramework/docs
> start-server-and-test "npm run serve -- --no-open" 3000 check-links

1: starting server using command "npm run serve -- --no-open"
and when url "[ 'http://127.0.0.1:3000' ]" is responding with HTTP status code 200
running tests using command "npm run check-links"


> fluid-framework-docs-site@0.0.0 serve
> docusaurus serve --no-open

[SUCCESS] Serving "build" directory at: http://localhost:3000/

> fluid-framework-docs-site@0.0.0 check-links
> linkcheck http://localhost:3000 --skip-file skipped-urls.txt

Crawling...

Stats:
  163679 links
    1315 destination URLs
    1547 URLs ignored
       0 warnings
       0 errors


@jason-ha jason-ha enabled auto-merge (squash) April 25, 2025 21:07
@jason-ha jason-ha merged commit fdb8934 into main Apr 25, 2025
43 checks passed
@jason-ha jason-ha deleted the true-or-undefined-runtime-option branch April 25, 2025 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: runtime Runtime related issues area: tests Tests to add, test infrastructure improvements, etc base: main PRs targeted against main branch public api change Changes to a public API
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants